Can a Paralegal Appear in Court on Matters Involving Indictable Charges?
Just the Same as When a Student-At-Law May Appear on Behalf of a Lawyer, a Paralegal May Also Appear.
A Helpful Guide to Understanding that Paralegals Are Permitted to Appear as Agents for Counsel at Certain Indictable Process Criminal Court Matters
Generally, paralegals are limited to only providing representation on Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 matters known as summary procedure charges where the maximum penalty is five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars and/or up to six months incarceration. Other matters, such as summary procedure charges with greater penalties, commonly referred to within the legal community as 'super' summary charges as well as the most serious of criminal matters, known as indictable charges, are out of scope of service for a paralegal; however, at various procedural hearings of an indictable offence matter within the Ontario Court of Justice, such as a remand hearing, a paralegal may appear as agent acting under the direction of the representing lawyer per R. v. G.Y.L., 2009 CanLII 38516 where it was said:
 In R. v. Golyanik, (2003) CanLII 64228 (Ont. S.C.), Trafford J. held that articling students could attend in the Ontario Court of Justice pursuant to a designation for the purpose of routine remands for indictable offences. In his carefully reasoned decision, he held that in the context of s. 650.01, the definition of “counsel” includes articled students-at-law and embraces a counsel’s law firm. He held that articling students could appear pursuant to a designation on remands for indictable matters in the Ontario Court of Justice. He did not rule on the issue of the status of paralegals in the same circumstances, because the issue was not before him.
 Trafford J. rooted his reasoning in the modern approach to statutory construction, with its emphasis on contextual and purposive interpretation. In my view, the same reasoning applies to this case.
 Paralegals are now governed by the Law Society. They are trained professionals subject to similar if not identical standards of ethics and civility as are lawyers and students-at-law. Properly regulated, they make a significant contribution to the administration of justice. Interpreting s. 650.01 in a way that prevents them from attending court in cases like this one would impede rather than enhance the proper and efficient administration of justice. If the purpose of s. 650.01 is to be respected, the definition of counsel demands a broad interpretation that encompasses paralegals and lets them appear in the Ontario Court of Justice on indictable matters pursuant to a proper designation.
Accordingly, it appears clear that for criminal matters proceeding as indictable offences within the Ontario Court of Justice, paralegals may appear as agents acting on behalf of the representing lawyer.
DefendCharges.ca may be available to provide agent appearance services for lawyers located in Toronto, St. Catharines, Caledon, Welland, Hamilton, among other places.
Quick & Easy Retainer Process
Contact DefendCharges.ca to obtain your free fifteen (15) minute consultation, a legal representative will review your circumstances, and explain your options for defending your matter. Consideration will also be given to your driving record and/or history of any past offence(s), as well as the potential consequences of a conviction.
DefendCharges.ca will obtain a copy of your driver’s licence or other government issued identification, a copy of the charging document(s), and details of the alleged offence(s) as well as any other information that you deem relevant.
DefendCharges.ca will forward a retainer agreement to you wherein the fees for legal services are outlined along with payment arrangement options as well as the nature of our relationship including our obligations to each other.
Circumstantial evidence may be interpreted in ways that infer a person is guilty or infer that a person is without guilt depending on reasonably plausible...Learn More
Reasonable doubt involves doubts that are reasonable and therefore when presenting theories that show innocence or an alternative to guilty, inferences must be...Learn More
A person who aids or abets or incites or encourages or assists, another person in committing a crime may be charged and found just as culpable as another...Learn More
The charge of assault, as a violation of section 265 of the Criminal Code may be prosecuted as an indictable offence or a summary conviction offence per the...Learn More
The de minimus non curat lex doctrine remains applicable to criminal law matters; accordingly, courts may disregard technically criminal conduct where social...Learn More
The charge of criminal harassment per section 264 of the Criminal Code is a serious charge with a potential penalty of ten (10) years imprisonment.Learn More
Criminal Libel Definition, s. 298 In addition to the potential of constituting as the tort of defamation per the civil law, defamatory libel may...Learn More
How Serious Is a Dangerous Driving Charge? A Dangerous Driving Charge, More Accurately a Dangerous Operation Charge, Is a Serious Criminal Concern With...Learn More
Can a Defence Strategy Including Showing a Reasonable Doubt In An Eyewitness Identification? When It Is Shown That There Is a Possibility That the Accused...Learn More
A charge of fraud per section 380 of the Criminal Code may be prosecuted as an indictable offence or a summary conviction offence depending on the specific...Learn More
The conduct of publishing, distributing, selling, or otherwise disseminating the private intimate image of another person without consent violates section...Learn More
The peace bond process within section 810 of the Criminal Code of Canada may enable a person reasonably fearful of another person to obtain a court Order to...Learn More
For a conviction on the charge of theft contrary to section 322 of the Criminal Code the Crown prosecutor is required to prove that the stolen property was in...Learn More
How Can a Theft Charge Be Defended? Success In Fighting a Theft Charge May Occur By Raising Reasonable Doubt That a Theft Actually Occurred or By Showing...Learn More
What constitutes as a threatening statement or utterance requires an objective and unbiased viewpoint to reasonably review the context and nature of the...Learn More